PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMF vs. PWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMF vs. PWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than PWC's 5.85% return.


USMF

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.76%
YTD
4.36%
6M
4.80%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*

PWC

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.31%
YTD
5.85%
6M
6.04%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMF vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
4.36%4.60%19.65%13.47%-8.82%21.26%12.01%24.06%-4.72%11.27%
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
5.85%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between USMF and PWC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.88

The correlation between USMF and PWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMF vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMF
PWC

Technology

35.6%
26.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
11.5%

Communication Services

10.3%
7.0%

Healthcare

9.3%
12.7%

Industrials

7.8%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
6.8%

Energy

4.1%
5.5%

Real Estate

2.0%
5.6%

Utilities

2.0%
2.7%

Basic Materials

0.9%
3.5%

Technology

USMF
35.6%
PWC
26.1%

Financial Services

USMF
11.8%
PWC
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

USMF
11.1%
PWC
11.5%

Communication Services

USMF
10.3%
PWC
7.0%

Healthcare

USMF
9.3%
PWC
12.7%

Industrials

USMF
7.8%
PWC
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

USMF
5.2%
PWC
6.8%

Energy

USMF
4.1%
PWC
5.5%

Real Estate

USMF
2.0%
PWC
5.6%

Utilities

USMF
2.0%
PWC
2.7%

Basic Materials

USMF
0.9%
PWC
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMF vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PWC
PWC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMF vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMFPWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.15

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.32

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

4.06

-1.14

USMF vs. PWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the PWC Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMF and PWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMFPWCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.88

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.38

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.11

+0.51

Drawdowns

USMF vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and PWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMFPWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-78.13%

+41.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.45%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-15.12%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-26.58%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-2.37%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-36.21%

+32.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.10%

+0.05%

Volatility

USMF vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.14%. This indicates that USMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMFPWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.14%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

7.19%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

9.75%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

16.07%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

18.81%

-1.84%

USMF vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

USMF vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison

USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than PWC's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWC
Invesco Dynamic Market ETF
1.68%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.32%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMF and PWC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USMF has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PWC (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs PWC's -78.13%.

On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.67% vs 6.10% for PWC. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.32% for USMF.

USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.60% for PWC.

PWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMF and PWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer