USMF vs. PWC
USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - USMF tracks the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index while PWC tracks the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMF returned 7.67%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for PWC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMF charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.
Performance
USMF vs. PWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMF achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than PWC's 5.85% return.
USMF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PWC
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
USMF vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.36% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 5.85% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMF and PWC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between USMF and PWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMF vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMF
PWC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
USMF
PWC
Financial Services
USMF
PWC
Consumer Cyclical
USMF
PWC
Communication Services
USMF
PWC
Healthcare
USMF
PWC
Industrials
USMF
PWC
Consumer Defensive
USMF
PWC
Energy
USMF
PWC
Real Estate
USMF
PWC
Utilities
USMF
PWC
Basic Materials
USMF
PWC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMF vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank
USMF
PWC
USMF vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMF | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.15 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.32 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 4.06 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMF | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.88 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.38 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.11 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
USMF vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMF drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMF and PWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMF | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -78.13% | +41.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.45% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -15.12% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -26.58% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -2.37% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -36.21% | +32.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.10% | +0.05% |
Volatility
USMF vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.14%. This indicates that USMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMF | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 2.14% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 7.19% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 9.75% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 16.07% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 18.81% | -1.84% |
USMF vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMF has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMF vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison
USMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than PWC's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMF and PWC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMF has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PWC (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMF dropped -36.24% vs PWC's -78.13%.
On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.67% vs 6.10% for PWC. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.
PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.32% for USMF.
USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USMF and 0.60% for PWC.
PWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMF and PWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer