USMC vs. YLD
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and YLD (Principal Active High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while YLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Principal. USMC is passively managed, while YLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMC returned 15.68%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for YLD. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for YLD.
Performance
USMC vs. YLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than YLD's 3.21% return.
USMC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
YLD
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 7.82%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
USMC vs. YLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 9.11% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 3.21% | 6.55% | 9.19% | 12.93% | -8.78% | 9.17% | 1.50% | 13.58% | -3.30% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and YLD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.50 |
The correlation between USMC and YLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
USMC vs. YLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
YLD
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USMC
YLD
-
Financial Services
USMC
YLD
-
Communication Services
USMC
YLD
-
Consumer Defensive
USMC
YLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
YLD
-
Healthcare
USMC
YLD
-
Industrials
USMC
YLD
-
Energy
USMC
YLD
-
Basic Materials
USMC
-
YLD
-
Real Estate
USMC
-
YLD
Utilities
USMC
-
YLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. YLD — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
YLD
USMC vs. YLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMC | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.82 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 2.74 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.09 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 14.21 | -4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMC | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.82 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.77 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.65 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
USMC vs. YLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, which is greater than YLD's maximum drawdown of -28.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and YLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -28.34% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -1.98% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -5.62% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | -13.89% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -2.70% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 0.57% | +2.12% |
Volatility
USMC vs. YLD - Volatility Comparison
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) at 1.26%. This indicates that USMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 1.26% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 3.49% | +5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 4.32% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 6.39% | +9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 8.21% | +10.04% |
USMC vs. YLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than YLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMC vs. YLD - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than YLD's 7.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 7.25% | 7.33% | 7.12% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 3.92% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 5.42% | 6.28% | 4.47% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMC and YLD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMC has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to YLD (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs YLD's -28.34%.
On 5-year performance, USMC leads with 15.68% vs 4.93% for YLD. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, YLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMC has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.
YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.
USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while YLD is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.39% for YLD.
USMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMC and YLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer