PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMC vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMC vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.


USMC

1D
0.11%
1M
5.62%
YTD
9.11%
6M
8.87%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.15%
1M
0.89%
YTD
61.95%
6M
59.31%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USMC vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
9.11%14.99%29.82%31.57%-17.17%26.30%16.05%27.37%-2.30%5.48%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
61.95%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between USMC and OILK is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.16

The correlation between USMC and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USMC vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USMC
OILK

Technology

29.1%

-

Financial Services

19.6%

-

Communication Services

14.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Industrials

5.6%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

USMC
29.1%
OILK

-

Financial Services

USMC
19.6%
OILK

-

Communication Services

USMC
14.7%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

USMC
9.6%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

USMC
8.4%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

USMC
8.1%
OILK

-

Industrials

USMC
5.6%
OILK

-

Energy

USMC
4.8%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

USMC

-

OILK

-

Real Estate

USMC

-

OILK

-

Utilities

USMC

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMC vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USMC
USMC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
USMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
USMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USMC vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USMCOILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

2.03

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

2.55

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.61

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

7.33

+2.05

USMC vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMC Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMC and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USMCOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.59

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.11

+0.73

Drawdowns

USMC vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMCOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-83.76%

+53.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-17.35%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

-23.42%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-34.69%

+10.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.99%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-32.62%

+28.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

8.56%

-5.87%

Volatility

USMC vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 2.49%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMCOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

11.11%

-8.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

23.24%

-14.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

28.86%

-17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

30.11%

-13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

35.98%

-17.73%

USMC vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

USMC vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than OILK's 8.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.29%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
0.74%0.79%1.04%1.35%1.78%1.53%1.55%2.01%2.28%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMC and OILK have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to USMC (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs 15.68% for USMC. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 15.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.

USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.68% for OILK.

USMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMC and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer