USMC vs. DLN
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - USMC tracks the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USMC returned 15.68%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
USMC vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 10.49% return.
USMC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
USMC vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 9.11% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 10.49% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and DLN is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between USMC and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
USMC vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
DLN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
USMC
DLN
Financial Services
USMC
DLN
Communication Services
USMC
DLN
Consumer Defensive
USMC
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
DLN
Healthcare
USMC
DLN
Industrials
USMC
DLN
Energy
USMC
DLN
Basic Materials
USMC
-
DLN
Real Estate
USMC
-
DLN
Utilities
USMC
-
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
DLN
USMC vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.66 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 3.81 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 3.91 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 16.58 | -7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.66 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.53 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
USMC vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -57.84% | +27.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -6.10% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | -13.71% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | -16.26% | -7.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -7.52% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.44% | +1.25% |
Volatility
USMC vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that USMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 2.17% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 6.78% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 8.86% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 13.26% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 16.16% | +2.09% |
USMC vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMC vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than DLN's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.78% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMC and DLN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USMC has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, USMC leads with 15.68% vs 12.46% for DLN. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMC has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 12.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.
USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMC and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer