USLN vs. SRLN
USLN (iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF) and SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both Bank Loan funds. USLN is passively managed, while SRLN is actively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. USLN charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
USLN vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USLN
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.26M | $48.21M | $73.40M | |
| $9.52K | $7.17K | $13.33K |
USLN vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF | 2.52% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between USLN and SRLN is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USLN vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
USLN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRLN
USLN vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF (USLN) and State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USLN | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USLN vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLN drawdown since its inception was -0.75%, smaller than the maximum SRLN drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLN and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLN | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -22.29% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -1.09% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
USLN vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USLN | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 2.94% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.23% | 3.92% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.23% | 6.06% | -3.83% |
USLN vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USLN has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
USLN vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
USLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than SRLN's 7.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 6.72% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USLN and SRLN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USLN is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USLN is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 2.13% for USLN.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for USLN and 0.70% for SRLN.
Find the right allocation for USLN and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer