USLN vs. LONZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

USLN (iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF) and LONZ (PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. USLN is passively managed, while LONZ is actively managed. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. USLN charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for LONZ.

Performance

USLN vs. LONZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF (USLN) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

USLN

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

LONZ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 2.54%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 7.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	$3.18M	$2.55M	$5.36M
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF	$9.50K	$7.15K	$13.48K

USLN vs. LONZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF	2.65%
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between USLN and LONZ is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

USLN vs. LONZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LONZ

LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 83
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USLN vs. LONZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF (USLN) and PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USLN	LONZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.07	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.52	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.48	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.22	—

Drawdowns

USLN vs. LONZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USLN drawdown since its inception was -0.75%, smaller than the maximum LONZ drawdown of -4.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLN and LONZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	USLN	LONZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-4.19%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-0.46%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USLN	LONZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23%	2.29%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.23%	3.17%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.23%	3.17%	-0.94%

USLN vs. LONZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

USLN has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than LONZ's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

USLN vs. LONZ - Dividend Comparison

USLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than LONZ's 8.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LONZ PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund	8.40%	6.60%	8.16%	8.29%	3.33%
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF	2.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USLN and LONZ in my portfolio?

USLN and LONZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USLN or LONZ?

On fees, USLN is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USLN or LONZ?

USLN is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for LONZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USLN or LONZ?

LONZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 2.78% for USLN.

What is the main difference between USLN and LONZ?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for USLN and 0.62% for LONZ.