USLN vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

USLN (iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan Broad Select Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USLN charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

USLN vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF (USLN) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

USLN

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -21.16%
• YTD: -31.78%
• 6M: -31.52%
• 1Y: -43.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USLN vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF	1.70%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between USLN and IBIT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2026	0.22

Return for Risk

USLN vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USLN vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF (USLN) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USLN	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.84	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.42	—

Drawdowns

USLN vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USLN drawdown since its inception was -0.75%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLN and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	USLN	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-52.49%	+51.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-52.49%	+52.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-16.91%	+16.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USLN	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43%	44.48%	-42.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.43%	50.25%	-47.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.43%	50.25%	-47.82%

USLN vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USLN has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

USLN vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

USLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%
USLN iShares Broad USD Floating Rate Loan ETF	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USLN and IBIT in my portfolio?

USLN and IBIT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USLN or IBIT?

On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USLN or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for USLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USLN or IBIT?

USLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between USLN and IBIT?

USLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. USLN tracks Morningstar LSTA US Leveraged Loan Broad Select Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for USLN and 0.25% for IBIT.