PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USL vs. JPMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USL vs. JPMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USL achieves a 39.93% return, which is significantly higher than JPMB's 1.95% return.


USL

1D
-0.53%
1M
-13.39%
YTD
39.93%
6M
37.90%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
9.43%

JPMB

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.76%
YTD
1.95%
6M
1.93%
1Y
10.60%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USL vs. JPMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
39.93%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-19.20%
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
1.95%13.73%1.46%9.48%-16.05%-2.26%5.36%17.71%-4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between USL and JPMB is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.06

The correlation between USL and JPMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USL vs. JPMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

JPMB
JPMB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USL vs. JPMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USLJPMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.31

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

9.81

-6.39

USL vs. JPMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the JPMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USL and JPMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USL vs. JPMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than JPMB's maximum drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and JPMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLJPMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.06%

-26.33%

-62.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-4.61%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-7.53%

-15.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

-26.16%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.93%

-0.53%

-46.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.39%

-7.02%

-54.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.72%

1.08%

+6.64%

Volatility

USL vs. JPMB - Volatility Comparison

United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF (JPMB) at 1.79%. This indicates that USL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLJPMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

1.79%

+6.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.20%

4.53%

+19.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.90%

5.43%

+23.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.24%

8.94%

+21.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.33%

9.63%

+22.70%

USL vs. JPMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USL has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than JPMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

USL vs. JPMB - Dividend Comparison

USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JPMB
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF
5.78%6.71%6.32%5.99%4.94%4.29%4.29%4.51%4.58%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USL and JPMB have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to JPMB (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USL dropped -89.06% vs JPMB's -26.33%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 12.73% vs 1.42% for JPMB. On fees, JPMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JPMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

JPMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

USL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while JPMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while JPMB tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for USL and 0.39% for JPMB.

JPMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USL and JPMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer