USL vs. INVG
USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) and INVG (GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while INVG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by GMO. USL is passively managed, while INVG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. USL charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for INVG.
Performance
USL vs. INVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USL achieves a 63.07% return, which is significantly higher than INVG's 0.68% return.
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
INVG
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL vs. INVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -2.51% |
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | 0.68% | 4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between USL and INVG is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USL vs. INVG — Risk / Return Rank
USL
INVG
USL vs. INVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USL | INVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USL | INVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.23 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
USL vs. INVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than INVG's maximum drawdown of -3.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and INVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USL | INVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.06% | -3.15% | -85.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.16% | -0.88% | -37.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.46% | -0.71% | -60.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | — | — |
Volatility
USL vs. INVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USL | INVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.54% | 4.42% | +24.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 4.42% | +25.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 4.42% | +27.93% |
USL vs. INVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
USL has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than INVG's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
USL vs. INVG - Dividend Comparison
USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | 4.68% | 2.81% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USL and INVG have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INVG is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INVG is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.68%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
USL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while INVG is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for USL and 0.25% for INVG.
Find the right allocation for USL and INVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer