USFI vs. RCLO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

USFI (BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF) and RCLO (Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USFI charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RCLO.

Performance

USFI vs. RCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USFI achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than RCLO's 2.42% return.

USFI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.47%
• 6M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 1Y: 5.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCLO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 2.09%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USFI vs. RCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF	0.97%	-0.31%
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	2.42%	1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between USFI and RCLO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

USFI vs. RCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USFI

USFI Risk / Return Rank: 77
USFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
USFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
USFI Omega Ratio Rank: 69
USFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
USFI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

RCLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USFI vs. RCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USFI	RCLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.51	—	—

Drawdowns

USFI vs. RCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USFI drawdown since its inception was -8.47%, which is greater than RCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USFI and RCLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	USFI	RCLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-3.70%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	0.00%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-0.44%	-1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	USFI	RCLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26%	2.93%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.89%	2.93%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.89%	2.93%	+3.96%

USFI vs. RCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USFI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RCLO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

USFI vs. RCLO - Dividend Comparison

USFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than RCLO's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	4.73%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF	4.44%	4.42%	4.60%	1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USFI and RCLO in my portfolio?

USFI and RCLO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USFI or RCLO?

On fees, USFI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USFI or RCLO?

USFI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RCLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USFI or RCLO?

RCLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.44% for USFI.

What is the main difference between USFI and RCLO?

They also come from different issuers: BrandywineGLOBAL and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for USFI and 0.50% for RCLO.