PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USD vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USD vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 86.87% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, USD has outperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 60.21%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.22% annualized return.


USD

1D
2.08%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
86.87%
6M
97.77%
1Y
207.86%
3Y*
111.11%
5Y*
65.02%
10Y*
60.21%

SIVR

1D
0.78%
1M
-22.74%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
9.46%
1Y
85.68%
3Y*
41.59%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USD vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
86.87%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%110.37%-26.88%81.72%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-4.75%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between USD and SIVR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USD vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USD vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USDSIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.58

1.90

+4.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.43

4.12

+14.31

USD vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USD Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USD and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USD vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USDSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-75.85%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.80%

-45.33%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.46%

-45.33%

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.85%

-45.33%

-32.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.85%

-45.33%

-32.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.67%

-41.89%

+28.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.32%

-47.83%

+15.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.34%

20.85%

-9.51%

Volatility

USD vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a higher volatility of 29.56% compared to abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 16.37%. This indicates that USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USDSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.56%

16.37%

+13.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.44%

59.11%

-6.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.34%

59.76%

+5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.19%

36.48%

+40.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.61%

32.03%

+37.58%

USD vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

USD vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.25%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


USD and SIVR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (29.56%) compared to SIVR (16.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USD dropped -88.63% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 10-year performance, USD leads with 60.21% vs 14.22% for SIVR. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SIVR has been the lower-risk option at 16.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 60.21% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for USD.

USD has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

USD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SIVR is Silver. USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%), while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 0.30% for SIVR.

USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USD and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer