USD vs. LINT
USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. USD is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. USD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
USD vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USD achieves a 55.27% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.
USD
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- 6M
- 41.04%
- YTD
- 55.27%
- 1Y
- 98.72%
- 3Y*
- 95.45%
- 5Y*
- 54.39%
- 10Y*
- 53.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 28.27%
LINT
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -46.62%
- 6M
- 135.02%
- YTD
- 266.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.84M | $20.02M | $35.16M | |
| $71.31M | $70.59M | $96.20M |
USD vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 55.27% | 7.11% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 266.23% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between USD and LINT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.62 |
USD vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USD
LINT
Technology
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USD
LINT
Financial Services
USD
LINT
-
Energy
USD
LINT
-
Basic Materials
USD
-
LINT
-
Communication Services
USD
-
LINT
-
Consumer Cyclical
USD
-
LINT
-
Consumer Defensive
USD
-
LINT
-
Healthcare
USD
-
LINT
-
Industrials
USD
-
LINT
-
Real Estate
USD
-
LINT
-
Utilities
USD
-
LINT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USD vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
USD
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USD vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USD | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USD vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USD drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USD and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USD | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.63% | -69.02% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.27% | -62.23% | +33.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.23% | -24.07% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.74% | — | — |
Volatility
USD vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USD | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.76% | 169.02% | -95.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.77% | 169.02% | -90.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.41% | 169.02% | -98.61% |
USD vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
USD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
USD vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
USD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than LINT's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.74% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.37% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USD and LINT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.37% for USD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for USD and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for USD and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer