USCL vs. DGRO
USCL (Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USCL returned 21.48% vs 23.89% for DGRO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
USCL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.64% return.
USCL
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 21.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 9.64%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
USCL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 7.58% | 14.26% | 27.04% | 12.71% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.64% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL and DGRO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between USCL and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
USCL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USCL
DGRO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
USCL
DGRO
Financial Services
USCL
DGRO
Communication Services
USCL
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
USCL
DGRO
Healthcare
USCL
DGRO
Industrials
USCL
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
USCL
DGRO
Energy
USCL
DGRO
Utilities
USCL
DGRO
Real Estate
USCL
DGRO
-
Basic Materials
USCL
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
USCL
DGRO
USCL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 3.71 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 14.33 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.53 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.77 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
USCL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -35.10% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -6.47% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | 0.00% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -3.44% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.67% | +0.91% |
Volatility
USCL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that USCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 2.24% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 6.94% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 9.49% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 13.82% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 16.62% | -1.79% |
USCL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both USCL and DGRO have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USCL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
USCL Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF | 1.07% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USCL has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 23.89% vs 21.48% for USCL. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 23.89% return vs 21.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USCL and DGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.07% for USCL.
USCL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. USCL tracks MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCL and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer