USCGX vs. CBYYX
USCGX (USAA Capital Growth Fund) and CBYYX (Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y) are both mutual funds - USCGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Victory, while CBYYX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Victory. Over the past year, USCGX returned 27.04% vs 10.95% for CBYYX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. USCGX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for CBYYX.
Performance
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCGX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than CBYYX's 2.27% return.
USCGX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
CBYYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.27%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 10.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund | 10.73% | 21.76% | 16.31% | 7.20% |
CBYYX Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y | 2.27% | 11.09% | 15.69% | 3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCGX and CBYYX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCGX vs. CBYYX — Risk / Return Rank
USCGX
CBYYX
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y (CBYYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCGX | CBYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -26.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 8.74 | -7.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 121.08 | -118.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 426.15 | -413.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCGX | CBYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 8.97 | -6.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.45 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, which is greater than CBYYX's maximum drawdown of -8.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCGX and CBYYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCGX | CBYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.08% | -8.72% | -54.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -0.09% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -1.31% | -17.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 0.03% | +2.21% |
Volatility
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y (CBYYX) at 0.20%. This indicates that USCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBYYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCGX | CBYYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 0.20% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 0.61% | +9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.40% | 1.23% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 8.22% | +9.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 8.22% | +9.81% |
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCGX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CBYYX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
USCGX vs. CBYYX - Dividend Comparison
USCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.83%, more than CBYYX's 8.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBYYX Victory Pioneer Cat Bond Fund Class Y | 8.93% | 9.14% | 10.33% | 9.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund | 9.83% | 10.89% | 12.63% | 1.08% | 7.69% | 12.56% | 3.08% | 9.18% | 9.40% | 3.22% | 1.46% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCGX and CBYYX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USCGX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to CBYYX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCGX dropped -63.08% vs CBYYX's -8.72%.
CBYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.97 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCGX and CBYYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer