USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

USCC.TO (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and ZPW.TO (BMO US Put Write ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, USCC.TO returned 12.65%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for ZPW.TO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USCC.TO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZPW.TO.

Performance

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCC.TO achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than ZPW.TO's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, USCC.TO has outperformed ZPW.TO with an annualized return of 12.65%, while ZPW.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.17% annualized return.

USCC.TO

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.82%
• 6M: 8.96%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 22.70%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

ZPW.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.28%
• 6M: 4.63%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 9.35%
• 10Y*: 6.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USCC.TO Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	11.95%	9.19%	31.45%	17.35%	-8.49%	21.99%	11.29%	16.61%	1.97%	7.70%
ZPW.TO BMO US Put Write ETF	6.23%	6.40%	13.88%	21.83%	-4.23%	13.18%	1.56%	-1.21%	3.01%	-1.78%

Correlation

The correlation between USCC.TO and ZPW.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015	0.39

Over the past year, USCC.TO and ZPW.TO have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCC.TO	ZPW.TO
Technology	35.6%	35.8%
Financial Services	11.8%	16.0%
Communication Services	11.2%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	2.0%
Healthcare	8.5%	14.2%
Industrials	8.3%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	13.6%
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCC.TO

USCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
USCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
USCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
USCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
USCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

ZPW.TO

ZPW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ZPW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ZPW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ZPW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ZPW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USCC.TO	ZPW.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.80	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.47	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.34	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	2.34	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	6.61	+7.13

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCC.TO and ZPW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, which is greater than ZPW.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCC.TO and ZPW.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCC.TO	ZPW.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.40%	-23.77%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.71%	-5.61%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	-12.35%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.55%	-16.57%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.40%	-23.77%	-4.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	0.00%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-4.05%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.66%	1.98%	-0.32%

Volatility

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) at 2.85%. This indicates that USCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCC.TO	ZPW.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	2.85%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	6.17%	+2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.05%	7.31%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.84%	10.61%	+3.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.55%	11.72%	+2.83%

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCC.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPW.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCC.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Dividend Comparison

USCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, which matches ZPW.TO's 9.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USCC.TO Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	9.48%	10.20%	9.86%	11.45%	10.42%	5.05%	5.17%	5.16%	6.19%	5.56%	5.59%	5.71%
ZPW.TO BMO US Put Write ETF	9.45%	9.55%	9.18%	7.57%	8.20%	7.24%	7.61%	7.17%	6.61%	6.82%	7.32%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCC.TO and ZPW.TO in my portfolio?

USCC.TO and ZPW.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USCC.TO or ZPW.TO?

On fees, USCC.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCC.TO or ZPW.TO?

USCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPW.TO.

What is the main difference between USCC.TO and ZPW.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for USCC.TO and 0.65% for ZPW.TO.