USCC.TO vs. RSPA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USCC.TO (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while RSPA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. USCC.TO is actively managed, while RSPA is passively managed. Over the past year, USCC.TO returned 24.60% vs 19.91% for RSPA. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCC.TO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RSPA.

Performance

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

USCC.TO is traded in CAD, while RSPA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RSPA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with USCC.TO having a 9.71% return and RSPA slightly lower at 9.24%.

USCC.TO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 24.60%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

RSPA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: 9.24%
• 6M: 8.07%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
USCC.TO Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	9.71%	9.20%	12.27%
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	9.24%	5.98%	8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between USCC.TO and RSPA is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	0.70

The correlation between USCC.TO and RSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCC.TO	RSPA
Technology	35.6%	18.3%
Financial Services	11.8%	14.4%
Communication Services	11.2%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.3%
Healthcare	8.5%	10.9%
Industrials	8.3%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	6.5%
Energy	3.5%	4.5%
Utilities	2.4%	6.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	6.2%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.1%

Return for Risk

USCC.TO vs. RSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCC.TO

USCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 80
USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
USCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
USCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
USCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
USCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

RSPA

RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 59
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCC.TO	RSPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.09	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	2.94	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.38	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.69	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.14	14.26	+0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the RSPA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCC.TO and RSPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCC.TO	RSPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.09	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.02	-0.08

Drawdowns

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than RSPA's maximum drawdown of -15.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCC.TO and RSPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCC.TO	RSPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-15.01%	-13.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.71%	-5.43%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-2.40%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.40%	+0.23%

Volatility

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) at 1.96%. This indicates that USCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCC.TO	RSPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	1.96%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.45%	6.95%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.32%	9.57%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	12.94%	+2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.36%	12.94%	+4.42%

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCC.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCC.TO vs. RSPA - Dividend Comparison

USCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.56%, more than RSPA's 8.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	8.98%	9.14%	4.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USCC.TO Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	9.56%	10.20%	9.65%	8.50%	7.94%	4.02%	3.85%	3.89%	4.76%	4.29%	4.68%	4.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCC.TO and RSPA in my portfolio?

USCC.TO and RSPA have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USCC.TO or RSPA?

On fees, RSPA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCC.TO or RSPA?

RSPA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for USCC.TO.

What is the main difference between USCC.TO and RSPA?

USCC.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RSPA is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for USCC.TO and 0.29% for RSPA.