PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZPW.TO (BMO US Put Write ETF) and BANK.TO (Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both Derivative Income funds. ZPW.TO is actively managed, while BANK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZPW.TO returned 11.38%/yr vs 35.68%/yr for BANK.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPW.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BANK.TO.

Performance

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPW.TO achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than BANK.TO's 29.36% return.

ZPW.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.29%
6M
4.22%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
6.04%

BANK.TO

1D
1.06%
1M
10.43%
YTD
29.36%
6M
28.70%
1Y
65.62%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZPW.TO
BMO US Put Write ETF		4.29%6.40%13.88%21.83%-0.22%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund		29.36%41.00%27.90%16.23%-20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPW.TO and BANK.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO US Put Write ETF

Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Often compared with BANK.TO:
BANK.TO vs. HMAX.TOBANK.TO vs. HCAL.TOBANK.TO vs. VDY.TOBANK.TO vs. RBNK.TOBANK.TO vs. HYLD.TOBANK.TO vs. VCN.TOBANK.TO vs. VEQT.TO

Return for Risk

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZPW.TO
ZPW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
BANK.TO
BANK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZPW.TOBANK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.68
5.37

-3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.31
7.24

-4.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.00

-0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

7.97

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

35.32

-29.20

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPW.TO and BANK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPW.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum BANK.TO drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPW.TO and BANK.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZPW.TOBANK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-29.03%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

-8.27%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-15.49%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-8.65%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.87%

+0.11%

Volatility

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) is 2.87%, while Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that ZPW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZPW.TOBANK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.10%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

10.62%

-4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.22%

12.29%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

15.61%

-5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

15.61%

-3.89%

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPW.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BANK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZPW.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, less than BANK.TO's 12.14% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund		12.14%13.73%15.28%13.60%10.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPW.TO
BMO US Put Write ETF		9.62%9.55%9.18%7.57%8.20%7.24%7.61%7.17%6.61%6.82%7.32%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZPW.TO and BANK.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BANK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BANK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPW.TO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZPW.TO and 0.60% for BANK.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPW.TO and BANK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer