PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCC.TO vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USCC.TO is traded in CAD, while SPYI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCC.TO achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 9.14% return.


USCC.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.08%
YTD
10.19%
6M
9.88%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
12.96%

SPYI

1D
-1.41%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.14%
6M
8.07%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.19%9.19%31.45%17.35%0.33%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
9.14%11.34%29.11%15.29%0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between USCC.TO and SPYI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022

0.55

The correlation between USCC.TO and SPYI shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCC.TO
SPYI

Technology

35.6%
39.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.3%

Industrials

8.3%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.1%

Utilities

2.4%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

USCC.TO
35.6%
SPYI
39.1%

Financial Services

USCC.TO
11.8%
SPYI
11.1%

Communication Services

USCC.TO
11.2%
SPYI
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

USCC.TO
10.1%
SPYI
9.9%

Healthcare

USCC.TO
8.5%
SPYI
8.3%

Industrials

USCC.TO
8.3%
SPYI
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

USCC.TO
4.9%
SPYI
4.5%

Energy

USCC.TO
3.5%
SPYI
3.1%

Utilities

USCC.TO
2.4%
SPYI
2.1%

Real Estate

USCC.TO
1.9%
SPYI
1.8%

Basic Materials

USCC.TO
1.8%
SPYI
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCC.TO vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCC.TO
USCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCC.TOSPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.15

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.46

12.80

+1.66

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCC.TO and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -17.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCC.TO and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCC.TOSPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-17.27%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-7.23%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-17.27%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-1.41%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-1.84%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.78%

-0.13%

Volatility

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) is 3.74%, while NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that USCC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCC.TOSPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.60%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

8.84%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

10.88%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

13.98%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

13.98%

+0.61%

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCC.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCC.TO vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

USCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.52%, less than SPYI's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
13.02%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
9.52%10.20%9.86%11.45%10.42%5.05%5.17%5.16%6.19%5.56%5.59%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCC.TO and SPYI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USCC.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYI.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for USCC.TO and 0.68% for SPYI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCC.TO and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer