PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCA vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCA vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


USCA

1D
0.46%
1M
4.36%
YTD
7.54%
6M
7.35%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
7.54%14.24%27.24%19.92%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%18.15%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and ITOT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.97

The correlation between USCA and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCA
ITOT

Technology

29.4%
33.8%

Financial Services

13.6%
12.1%

Communication Services

12.7%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.7%
9.0%

Industrials

7.0%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.1%

Technology

USCA
29.4%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

USCA
13.6%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

USCA
12.7%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

USCA
11.9%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

USCA
10.7%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

USCA
7.0%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

USCA
4.7%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

USCA
3.5%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

USCA
2.4%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

USCA
2.3%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

USCA
1.9%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCA vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA
USCA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCAITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.25

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

14.92

-6.59

USCA vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCAITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.37

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

0.57

+0.92

Drawdowns

USCA vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCAITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-55.20%

+36.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-8.90%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-19.44%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.25%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-6.97%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.94%

+0.64%

Volatility

USCA vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCAITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.94%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.14%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

12.19%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

17.35%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

18.26%

-3.51%

USCA vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USCA vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than ITOT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
1.08%1.14%1.22%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, USCA and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to USCA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 3-year performance, ITOT leads with 22.39% vs 20.91% for USCA. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 22.39% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for USCA.

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.97% for ITOT.

USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCA and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer