USCA vs. BUFX
USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
USCA vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 3.84% return.
USCA
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCA vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 3.65% | 10.28% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 3.84% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCA and BUFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCA vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
USCA
BUFX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USCA vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USCA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USCA vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -2.87% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -0.59% | -3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -0.24% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | — | — |
Volatility
USCA vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 4.05% | +8.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 4.05% | +10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 4.05% | +10.80% |
USCA vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
USCA vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 1.15% | 1.14% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA and BUFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
USCA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for USCA and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer