USCA vs. BHYB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and BHYB (Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB-B Non-FNCL Non-Distressed US HY Constrained Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USCA returned 21.47% vs 7.27% for BHYB. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BHYB.

Performance

USCA vs. BHYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than BHYB's 1.84% return.

USCA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BHYB

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 2.25%
• 1Y: 7.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. BHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	7.54%	14.24%	27.24%	16.44%
BHYB Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF	1.84%	8.90%	6.44%	8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and BHYB is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023	0.65

The correlation between USCA and BHYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USCA vs. BHYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 50
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BHYB

BHYB Risk / Return Rank: 72
BHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. BHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCA	BHYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.15	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.38	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	3.21	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	14.74	-6.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCA vs. BHYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BHYB Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and BHYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCA	BHYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.15	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	2.12	-0.62

Drawdowns

USCA vs. BHYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than BHYB's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and BHYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	BHYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-4.23%	-14.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-2.27%	-7.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.06%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-0.40%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	0.49%	+2.09%

Volatility

USCA vs. BHYB - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) at 1.02%. This indicates that USCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	BHYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	1.02%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	2.52%	+6.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	3.40%	+8.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	4.70%	+10.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	4.70%	+10.05%

USCA vs. BHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BHYB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USCA vs. BHYB - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than BHYB's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BHYB Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF	6.32%	6.57%	7.04%	0.75%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.08%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and BHYB in my portfolio?

USCA and BHYB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or BHYB?

USCA has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to BHYB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs BHYB's -4.23%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or BHYB?

On 1-year performance, USCA leads with 21.47% vs 7.27% for BHYB. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BHYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or BHYB?

Over the 1-year period, USCA has performed better with a 21.47% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or BHYB?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BHYB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or BHYB?

BHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 1.08% for USCA.

What is the main difference between USCA and BHYB?

USCA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BHYB is High Yield Bonds. USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B Non-FNCL Non-Distressed US HY Constrained Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.20% for BHYB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.