PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHYB vs. BNDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BHYB vs. BNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) and FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BHYB vs. BNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BHYB
Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF
-0.01%8.90%6.44%8.23%
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
0.06%7.29%0.86%8.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHYB achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BNDC's 0.06% return.


BHYB

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
1.30%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDC

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.66%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BHYB vs. BNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHYB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDC's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BHYB vs. BNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHYB
BHYB Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDC
BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHYB vs. BNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) and FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BHYBBNDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

0.88

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

1.26

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.16

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.70

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.89

4.79

+6.10

BHYB vs. BNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the BNDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHYB and BNDC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHYBBNDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.88

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

0.21

+1.86

Correlation

The correlation between BHYB and BNDC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BHYB vs. BNDC - Dividend Comparison

BHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than BNDC's 4.27% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BHYB
Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF
6.54%6.57%7.04%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
4.27%4.16%3.81%3.19%2.64%1.72%2.61%2.89%2.86%2.50%0.64%

Drawdowns

BHYB vs. BNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHYB drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum BNDC drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHYB and BNDC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BHYBBNDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-18.80%

+14.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.74%

-2.61%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-3.35%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-7.43%

+7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.93%

-0.24%

Volatility

BHYB vs. BNDC - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) at 1.53%. This indicates that BHYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BHYBBNDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

1.53%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

2.69%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.13%

4.61%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.77%

6.06%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

8.11%

-3.34%