PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLSX vs. MXCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 18.63% return, which is significantly higher than MXCPX's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has outperformed MXCPX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while MXCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.


MXLSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
4.26%
YTD
18.63%
6M
16.56%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
9.79%

MXCPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.87%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.97%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
18.63%4.08%8.20%17.81%-10.07%31.12%2.84%24.67%-16.64%8.44%
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
4.12%8.19%4.95%8.41%-10.33%6.35%8.07%11.40%-3.95%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLSX and MXCPX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1999

0.74

The correlation between MXLSX and MXCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLSX vs. MXCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLSX
MXLSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MXLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MXCPX
MXCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MXCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MXCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXLSXMXCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.40

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

10.07

-0.01

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the MXCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLSX and MXCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than MXCPX's maximum drawdown of -35.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and MXCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLSXMXCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-35.02%

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-3.88%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-5.57%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-17.81%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-17.81%

-25.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.25%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-12.50%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.92%

+2.15%

Volatility

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) at 1.60%. This indicates that MXLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLSXMXCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

1.60%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

3.89%

+7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

4.74%

+11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

6.74%

+14.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

6.53%

+15.79%

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MXCPX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Dividend Comparison

MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than MXCPX's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.32%3.45%4.53%4.17%5.70%5.20%2.46%5.62%5.53%2.70%
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
0.40%0.48%1.07%2.24%2.93%6.23%0.23%0.47%2.92%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXLSX and MXCPX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLSX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to MXCPX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs MXCPX's -35.02%.

MXCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLSX and MXCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer