MXLSX vs. MXCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX).
MXLSX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Nov 1, 1994. MXCPX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999.
Performance
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 1.81% | 4.08% | 8.20% | 17.81% | -10.07% | 31.12% | 2.84% | 24.67% | -16.64% | 8.44% |
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | -0.90% | 8.19% | 4.95% | 8.41% | -10.33% | 6.35% | 8.07% | 11.40% | -3.95% | 5.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than MXCPX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has outperformed MXCPX with an annualized return of 8.19%, while MXCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return.
MXLSX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -6.65%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 13.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
MXCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MXCPX's 0.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXLSX vs. MXCPX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLSX
MXCPX
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXLSX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 1.13 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 1.57 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.37 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 5.54 | -2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXLSX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 1.13 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.41 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.56 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.07 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLSX and MXCPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Dividend Comparison
MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than MXCPX's 3.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 0.47% | 0.48% | 1.07% | 2.24% | 2.93% | 6.23% | 0.23% | 0.47% | 2.92% | 5.29% |
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 3.49% | 3.45% | 4.53% | 4.17% | 5.70% | 5.20% | 2.46% | 5.62% | 5.53% | 2.70% |
Drawdowns
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than MXCPX's maximum drawdown of -35.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and MXCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLSX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.41% | -35.02% | -25.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.02% | -4.11% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -17.81% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.52% | -17.81% | -25.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -3.75% | -5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -12.61% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 1.02% | +3.17% |
Volatility
MXLSX vs. MXCPX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) at 1.97%. This indicates that MXLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXLSX | MXCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 1.97% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 3.19% | +8.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.41% | 5.27% | +18.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 6.68% | +14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 6.49% | +15.79% |