MXLSX vs. MXEOX
MXLSX (Great-West Small Cap Value Fund) and MXEOX (Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - MXLSX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Great-West, while MXEOX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 5 years, MXLSX returned 8.79%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for MXEOX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXLSX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for MXEOX.
Performance
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than MXEOX's 33.08% return.
MXLSX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- 30.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
MXEOX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 34.70%
- 1Y
- 58.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 18.78% | 4.08% | 8.20% | 17.81% | -10.07% | 31.12% | 2.84% | 24.67% | -17.00% |
MXEOX Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 33.08% | 32.78% | 9.84% | 9.67% | -22.34% | -3.49% | 18.39% | 21.67% | -21.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLSX and MXEOX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MXLSX and MXEOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXLSX vs. MXEOX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLSX
MXEOX
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXLSX | MXEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.55 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 4.40 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 16.54 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than MXEOX's maximum drawdown of -41.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and MXEOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLSX | MXEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.41% | -41.05% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -13.95% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -17.25% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -38.36% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.06% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -17.10% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.65% | -0.58% |
Volatility
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) is 4.36%, while Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MXEOX) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that MXLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXEOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXLSX | MXEOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 10.96% | -6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 18.59% | -7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 20.93% | -4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 18.20% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 19.36% | +2.95% |
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MXEOX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXLSX vs. MXEOX - Dividend Comparison
MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than MXEOX's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXEOX Great-West Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 0.75% | 1.00% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 1.61% | 3.42% | 1.85% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 0.40% | 0.48% | 1.07% | 2.24% | 2.93% | 6.23% | 0.23% | 0.47% | 2.92% | 5.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXLSX and MXEOX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXEOX has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to MXLSX (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs MXEOX's -41.05%.
MXEOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXLSX and MXEOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer