USBNX vs. CSMIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USBNX (Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund) and CSMIX (Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, USBNX returned 7.77%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for CSMIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USBNX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CSMIX.

Performance

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBNX achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than CSMIX's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, USBNX has underperformed CSMIX with an annualized return of 7.77%, while CSMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.

USBNX

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 11.24%
• 6M: 11.01%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 13.88%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

CSMIX

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 12.32%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 35.97%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund	11.24%	8.02%	8.64%	12.83%	-5.09%	15.35%	-4.77%	23.53%	-11.05%	6.42%
CSMIX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I	12.32%	14.65%	8.66%	21.42%	-8.87%	28.95%	7.82%	21.01%	-18.37%	13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USBNX and CSMIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 1992	0.90

The correlation between USBNX and CSMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USBNX vs. CSMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBNX

USBNX Risk / Return Rank: 29
USBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
USBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
USBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
USBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
USBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CSMIX

CSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
CSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USBNX	CSMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.98	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.83	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.34	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	2.98	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.03	10.52	-3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the CSMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBNX and CSMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USBNX	CSMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.98	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.41	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.48	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.49	-0.10

Drawdowns

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBNX drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, which is greater than CSMIX's maximum drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBNX and CSMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USBNX	CSMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.40%	-53.37%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-11.94%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.56%	-25.98%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.01%	-25.98%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.96%	-48.42%	+1.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-1.52%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.63%	-8.92%	-4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.38%	-0.40%

Volatility

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) is 3.72%, while Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that USBNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USBNX	CSMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	4.67%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.32%	11.89%	-2.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	18.12%	-3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	21.50%	-2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.66%	23.93%	-2.27%

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBNX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

USBNX vs. CSMIX - Dividend Comparison

USBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%, less than CSMIX's 12.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSMIX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I	12.67%	14.23%	6.67%	7.57%	6.02%	13.34%	0.50%	3.58%	9.79%	11.56%	11.58%	12.73%
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund	12.41%	13.81%	3.27%	0.86%	10.05%	0.75%	0.68%	7.91%	8.39%	6.21%	1.17%	7.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USBNX and CSMIX in my portfolio?

USBNX and CSMIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USBNX or CSMIX?

CSMIX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to USBNX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBNX dropped -64.40% vs CSMIX's -53.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.