USAI vs. MLPX
USAI (Pacer American Energy Independence ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USAI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the American Energy Independence Index, while MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USAI returned 18.33%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for MLPX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
USAI vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAI achieves a 22.18% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.59% return.
USAI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 21.52%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 23.51%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
USAI vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 22.18% | 0.69% | 43.99% | 14.21% | 19.82% | 37.10% | -15.10% | 21.63% | -17.31% | 3.69% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.59% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between USAI and MLPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017 | 0.94 |
The correlation between USAI and MLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
USAI vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USAI
MLPX
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
USAI
MLPX
Utilities
USAI
MLPX
Basic Materials
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Communication Services
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Defensive
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Financial Services
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Healthcare
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Industrials
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Real Estate
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Technology
USAI
-
MLPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USAI vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
USAI
MLPX
USAI vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAI | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.82 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.85 | 7.27 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAI | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.50 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.05 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.35 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
USAI vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAI drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAI and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAI | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.25% | -70.67% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -8.18% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | -16.77% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.68% | -19.72% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -5.68% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -16.63% | +7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.17% | +0.81% |
Volatility
USAI vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) have volatilities of 6.52% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USAI | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 6.41% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 11.84% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 15.38% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 20.08% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 26.50% | +0.81% |
USAI vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
USAI vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
USAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, which matches MLPX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 4.19% | 5.03% | 3.62% | 4.99% | 5.41% | 6.15% | 7.67% | 6.50% | 5.56% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, USAI and MLPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USAI has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to MLPX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAI dropped -65.25% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
On 5-year performance, MLPX leads with 20.92% vs 18.33% for USAI. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 20.92% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for USAI.
USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 4.15% for MLPX.
USAI is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPX is MLPs. USAI tracks American Energy Independence Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USAI and 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USAI and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer