PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAI vs. CGHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAI vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAI achieves a 22.84% return, which is significantly higher than CGHM's 2.57% return.


USAI

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.89%
YTD
22.84%
6M
20.56%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*

CGHM

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.57%
6M
3.12%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAI vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
22.84%0.69%23.19%
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
2.57%4.56%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between USAI and CGHM is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

-0.09

The correlation between USAI and CGHM shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAI vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAI
USAI Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
USAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
USAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAI Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAI vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAICGHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.66

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.61

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

13.99

-8.78

USAI vs. CGHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the CGHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAI and CGHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAICGHMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.94

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.14

-0.64

Drawdowns

USAI vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAI drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, which is greater than CGHM's maximum drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAI and CGHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAICGHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.25%

-5.90%

-59.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-2.55%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-0.16%

-5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-1.24%

-8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

0.66%

+3.35%

Volatility

USAI vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison

Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) at 1.03%. This indicates that USAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAICGHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

1.03%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

2.21%

+10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

3.13%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

4.52%

+16.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

4.52%

+22.79%

USAI vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAI vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison

USAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than CGHM's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.81%3.61%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
4.17%5.03%3.62%4.99%5.41%6.15%7.67%6.50%5.56%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAI and CGHM have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAI has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to CGHM (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAI dropped -65.25% vs CGHM's -5.90%.

On 1-year performance, USAI leads with 20.84% vs 9.16% for CGHM. On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, CGHM has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USAI has performed better with a 20.84% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for USAI.

USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 3.81% for CGHM.

USAI is categorized as Energy Equities, while CGHM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USAI and 0.34% for CGHM.

CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAI and CGHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer