PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAF vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAF vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlas America Fund (USAF) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAF achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's 5.08% return.


USAF

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
2.08%
6M
2.69%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOM

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.36%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.24%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAF vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USAF
Atlas America Fund
2.08%9.09%0.23%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
5.08%12.90%-0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between USAF and EAOM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAF vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAF
USAF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
USAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAF Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAF Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAF vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas America Fund (USAF) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAFEAOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.85

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

12.53

-9.27

USAF vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAF and EAOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAFEAOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.29

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.76

+0.57

Drawdowns

USAF vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAF drawdown since its inception was -4.46%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAF and EAOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAFEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-20.73%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

-5.17%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-0.45%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-4.97%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.17%

+0.69%

Volatility

USAF vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atlas America Fund (USAF) is 1.08%, while iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that USAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAFEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

2.31%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

5.24%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00%

6.44%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

8.07%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

7.91%

-2.22%

USAF vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAF vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

USAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than EAOM's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.78%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%
USAF
Atlas America Fund
2.45%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAF and EAOM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAOM has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to USAF (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAF dropped -4.46% vs EAOM's -20.73%.

On 1-year performance, EAOM leads with 14.66% vs 6.07% for USAF. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, USAF has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EAOM has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for USAF.

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.45% for USAF.

They also come from different issuers: Atlas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for USAF and 0.18% for EAOM.

EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAF and EAOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer