PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAC vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAC vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAC achieves a 26.30% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's 3.08% return.


USAC

1D
-2.04%
1M
3.53%
YTD
26.30%
6M
17.13%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
23.88%
10Y*
19.04%

PFFA

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.08%
6M
4.03%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAC vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
26.30%6.38%12.67%28.80%25.91%45.90%-10.09%57.91%-22.84%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.08%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between USAC and PFFA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.31

The correlation between USAC and PFFA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAC vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAC
USAC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAC vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USACPFFADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

2.12

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

3.00

-1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.29

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.87

7.79

-4.92

USAC vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAC and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USACPFFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

2.12

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.57

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.24

+0.13

Drawdowns

USAC vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAC drawdown since its inception was -78.96%, which is greater than PFFA's maximum drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAC and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USACPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.96%

-70.52%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-6.49%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.35%

-12.15%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-22.70%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.92%

-1.50%

-6.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

-6.65%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

1.90%

+4.17%

Volatility

USAC vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 1.87%. This indicates that USAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USACPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

1.87%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.72%

5.68%

+12.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.02%

7.02%

+18.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

11.51%

+16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.78%

31.84%

+10.94%

Dividends

USAC vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

USAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, less than PFFA's 9.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.62%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
7.53%9.13%8.91%9.20%10.75%12.03%15.44%11.58%16.18%12.70%12.14%18.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAC and PFFA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAC has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to PFFA (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAC dropped -78.96% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAC and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer