USAC vs. PFFA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA).

PFFA is an actively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners. It was launched on May 15, 2018.

Performance

USAC vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

USAC vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
USAC USA Compression Partners, LP	20.43%	6.38%	12.67%	28.80%	25.91%	45.90%	-10.09%	57.91%	-22.84%
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF	-3.22%	8.22%	16.11%	26.45%	-20.91%	23.53%	-7.87%	31.99%	-7.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAC achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than PFFA's -3.22% return.

USAC

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 20.43%
• 6M: 18.10%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 25.70%
• 10Y*: 23.08%

PFFA

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -4.25%
• YTD: -3.22%
• 6M: -1.63%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 5.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

USAC vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAC

USAC Risk / Return Rank: 51
USAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
USAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
USAC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
USAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
USAC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

PFFA

PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 30
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAC vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USAC	PFFA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	0.57	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	0.78	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.12	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	0.58	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	2.04	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USAC vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAC and PFFA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USAC	PFFA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33	0.57	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.51	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.22	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between USAC and PFFA is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

USAC vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

USAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, less than PFFA's 10.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USAC USA Compression Partners, LP	7.74%	9.13%	8.91%	9.20%	10.75%	12.03%	15.44%	11.58%	16.18%	12.70%	12.14%	18.06%
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF	10.06%	9.47%	9.18%	9.56%	10.75%	7.64%	8.54%	10.02%	5.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

USAC vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAC drawdown since its inception was -78.96%, which is greater than PFFA's maximum drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAC and PFFA.

Drawdown Indicators

	USAC	PFFA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.96%	-70.52%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.12%	-8.54%	-11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	-22.70%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.37%	-6.07%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.83%	-6.77%	-6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.88%	2.41%	+6.47%

Volatility

USAC vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 3.26%. This indicates that USAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USAC	PFFA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	3.26%	+2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.72%	5.25%	+12.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.22%	9.98%	+19.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.49%	11.49%	+17.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.04%	32.17%	+10.87%