URW.PA vs. 0002.HK
URW.PA (Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield) and 0002.HK (CLP Holdings) are both stocks. URW.PA operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while 0002.HK operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, URW.PA returned 9.00%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for 0002.HK. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
URW.PA is traded in EUR, while 0002.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0002.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with URW.PA having a 15.63% return and 0002.HK slightly lower at 15.38%.
URW.PA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 1Y
- 34.67%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- —
0002.HK
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.45%
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URW.PA Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield | 15.63% | 33.68% | 12.19% | 37.61% | -21.08% | -4.58% | -49.89% | 7.58% | -29.28% |
0002.HK CLP Holdings | 15.38% | -1.65% | 13.84% | 15.82% | -19.89% | 22.27% | -16.04% | -1.43% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between URW.PA and 0002.HK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018 | 0.05 |
The correlation between URW.PA and 0002.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK — Risk / Return Rank
URW.PA
0002.HK
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW.PA) and CLP Holdings (0002.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URW.PA | 0002.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.73 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 8.65 | -0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URW.PA drawdown since its inception was -82.57%, which is greater than 0002.HK's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URW.PA and 0002.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URW.PA | 0002.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.57% | -29.37% | -53.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -7.04% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -11.80% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.43% | -28.73% | -19.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.28% | 0.00% | -32.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.74% | -9.67% | -42.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 3.01% | +0.94% |
Volatility
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Volatility Comparison
Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to CLP Holdings (0002.HK) at 3.98%. This indicates that URW.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0002.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URW.PA | 0002.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 3.98% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 10.90% | +4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.69% | 13.27% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.65% | 17.27% | +15.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.01% | 17.12% | +25.89% |
Dividends
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Dividend Comparison
URW.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than 0002.HK's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002.HK CLP Holdings | 4.18% | 4.53% | 4.75% | 4.81% | 5.44% | 3.94% | 4.30% | 3.76% | 3.36% | 3.58% | 3.87% | 4.02% |
URW.PA Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield | 4.39% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.36% | 3.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
URW.PA vs. 0002.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield and CLP Holdings. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
URW.PA and 0002.HK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for URW.PA and 0002.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer