PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URW.PA vs. CLILF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW.PA) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

URW.PA is traded in EUR, while CLILF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLILF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URW.PA achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than CLILF's 7.77% return.


URW.PA

1D
-1.13%
1M
0.24%
YTD
10.17%
6M
13.37%
1Y
24.44%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*

CLILF

1D
-5.39%
1M
-11.82%
YTD
7.77%
6M
34.40%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
-8.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
URW.PA
Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
10.17%33.68%12.19%37.61%-21.08%-7.03%
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
7.77%-14.56%5.44%-26.21%12.57%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between URW.PA and CLILF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URW.PA vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URW.PA
URW.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
URW.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URW.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
URW.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
URW.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
URW.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW.PA) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URW.PACLILFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

0.21

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

0.84

+1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

0.45

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.85

0.90

+4.94

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URW.PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the CLILF Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URW.PA and CLILF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URW.PACLILFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

0.21

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.06

-0.05

Drawdowns

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URW.PA drawdown since its inception was -81.82%, which is greater than CLILF's maximum drawdown of -68.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URW.PA and CLILF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URW.PACLILFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.82%

-68.88%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-28.44%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-48.64%

+24.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.70%

-57.93%

+25.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.33%

-45.21%

-5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

14.19%

-10.04%

Volatility

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW.PA) is 4.65%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that URW.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URW.PACLILFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

10.38%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

54.48%

-39.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

62.51%

-44.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.01%

80.12%

-47.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.25%

80.12%

-36.87%

Dividends

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison

URW.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than CLILF's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
3.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URW.PA
Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield
4.61%3.77%3.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.36%7.68%

Financials

URW.PA vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. URW.PA values in EUR, CLILF values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


URW.PA and CLILF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URW.PA and CLILF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer