PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0002.HK vs. 0006.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 0002.HK and 0006.HK is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CLP Holdings (0002.HK) and Power Assets (0006.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
328.29%
401.95%
0002.HK
0006.HK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

0002.HK:

0.59

0006.HK:

0.69

Sortino Ratio

0002.HK:

0.94

0006.HK:

1.10

Omega Ratio

0002.HK:

1.12

0006.HK:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

0002.HK:

0.43

0006.HK:

0.87

Martin Ratio

0002.HK:

1.52

0006.HK:

2.04

Ulcer Index

0002.HK:

6.24%

0006.HK:

6.70%

Daily Std Dev

0002.HK:

15.89%

0006.HK:

19.80%

Max Drawdown

0002.HK:

-38.72%

0006.HK:

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

0002.HK:

-11.55%

0006.HK:

-10.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

0002.HK:

HK$163.59B

0006.HK:

HK$104.74B

EPS

0002.HK:

HK$0.00

0006.HK:

HK$0.00

PE Ratio

0002.HK:

13.92

0006.HK:

17.13

PEG Ratio

0002.HK:

3.44

0006.HK:

3.28

PS Ratio

0002.HK:

1.80

0006.HK:

93.02

PB Ratio

0002.HK:

1.57

0006.HK:

1.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

0002.HK:

HK$44.09B

0006.HK:

HK$454.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

0002.HK:

HK$6.43B

0006.HK:

HK$454.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

0002.HK:

HK$10.98B

0006.HK:

HK$456.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0002.HK achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than 0006.HK's -9.57% return. Over the past 10 years, 0002.HK has outperformed 0006.HK with an annualized return of 3.83%, while 0006.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 2.32% annualized return.


0002.HK

YTD

1.08%

1M

1.41%

6M

-0.52%

1Y

13.79%

5Y*

0.08%

10Y*

3.83%

0006.HK

YTD

-9.57%

1M

1.87%

6M

-4.28%

1Y

20.39%

5Y*

5.66%

10Y*

2.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0002.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 0002.HK is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 0002.HK is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 0002.HK is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 0002.HK is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 0002.HK is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 0002.HK is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

0006.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 0006.HK is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 0006.HK is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 0006.HK is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 0006.HK is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 0006.HK is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 0006.HK is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CLP Holdings (0002.HK) and Power Assets (0006.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0002.HK, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
0002.HK: 0.65
0006.HK: 0.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0002.HK, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
0002.HK: 1.02
0006.HK: 1.17
The chart of Omega ratio for 0002.HK, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
0002.HK: 1.12
0006.HK: 1.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0002.HK, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
0002.HK: 0.47
0006.HK: 0.94
The chart of Martin ratio for 0002.HK, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
0002.HK: 1.68
0006.HK: 2.24

The current 0002.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the 0006.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0002.HK and 0006.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.65
0.74
0002.HK
0006.HK

Dividends

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK - Dividend Comparison

0002.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than 0006.HK's 5.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
0002.HK
CLP Holdings
4.86%4.75%4.81%5.44%3.94%4.30%3.76%3.36%3.58%3.87%4.02%3.87%
0006.HK
Power Assets
5.74%5.19%6.23%6.60%5.80%6.67%4.91%16.15%11.81%3.98%3.77%3.42%

Drawdowns

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0002.HK drawdown since its inception was -38.72%, which is greater than 0006.HK's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0002.HK and 0006.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.58%
-10.12%
0002.HK
0006.HK

Volatility

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CLP Holdings (0002.HK) is 4.78%, while Power Assets (0006.HK) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that 0002.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0006.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
4.78%
6.47%
0002.HK
0006.HK

Financials

0002.HK vs. 0006.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CLP Holdings and Power Assets. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab