URTH vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. URTH is passively managed, while WBIF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, URTH returned 13.19%/yr vs 5.52%/yr for WBIF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URTH charges 0.24%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

URTH vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than WBIF's 11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, URTH has outperformed WBIF with an annualized return of 13.19%, while WBIF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.52% annualized return.

URTH

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: 13.19%

WBIF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 11.61%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 23.01%
• 3Y*: 8.85%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTH vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	10.16%	21.36%	18.66%	23.95%	-17.97%	22.27%	15.78%	28.15%	-8.56%	22.95%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	11.61%	9.16%	3.43%	0.49%	-8.38%	16.56%	-2.71%	2.68%	-4.68%	19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between URTH and WBIF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014	0.72

The correlation between URTH and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

URTH vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URTH	WBIF
Technology	28.3%	19.9%
Financial Services	15.8%	31.0%
Industrials	11.3%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	11.1%
Communication Services	9.3%	2.6%
Healthcare	8.8%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	3.1%
Energy	4.2%	2.9%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.0%
Utilities	2.7%	10.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

URTH vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTH

URTH Risk / Return Rank: 63
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 62
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTH vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URTH	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.88	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.73	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	3.50	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.11	12.53	+0.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URTH vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTH and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URTH	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.88	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.19	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.45	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.30	+0.42

Drawdowns

URTH vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than WBIF's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	URTH	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-20.29%	-13.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.06%	-6.60%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.94%	-17.16%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.05%	-20.29%	-5.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.01%	-20.29%	-13.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.97%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-7.74%	+3.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.84%	+0.15%

Volatility

URTH vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is 3.27%, while WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that URTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URTH	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	4.13%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	8.63%	+0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	12.31%	-0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	12.86%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.27%	12.34%	+4.93%

URTH vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTH has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

URTH vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	1.35%	1.48%	1.47%	1.70%	1.68%	1.50%	1.52%	2.16%	2.30%	1.88%	2.15%	2.35%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URTH and WBIF in my portfolio?

URTH and WBIF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URTH or WBIF?

WBIF has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to URTH (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTH dropped -34.01% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, URTH or WBIF?

On 10-year performance, URTH leads with 13.19% vs 5.52% for WBIF. On fees, URTH is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, URTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URTH or WBIF?

Over the 10-year period, URTH has performed better with a 13.19% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URTH or WBIF?

URTH is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URTH or WBIF?

URTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between URTH and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for URTH and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.