URTH vs. NZAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) and NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) are both Global Equities funds - URTH tracks the MSCI World Index (Net) while NZAC tracks the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URTH returned 13.19%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for NZAC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URTH charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for NZAC.

Performance

URTH vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, URTH has outperformed NZAC with an annualized return of 13.19%, while NZAC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.16% annualized return.

URTH

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 26.06%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: 13.19%

NZAC

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTH vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	10.16%	21.36%	18.66%	23.95%	-17.97%	22.27%	15.78%	28.15%	-8.56%	22.95%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	8.83%	20.55%	16.67%	23.22%	-19.77%	18.35%	17.21%	28.24%	-9.80%	22.93%

Correlation

The correlation between URTH and NZAC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2014	0.87

The correlation between URTH and NZAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.97 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

URTH vs. NZAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URTH	NZAC
Technology	28.3%	34.3%
Financial Services	15.8%	13.1%
Industrials	11.3%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.2%
Communication Services	9.3%	8.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	1.0%
Energy	4.2%	1.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.9%
Utilities	2.7%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	5.2%

Return for Risk

URTH vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTH

URTH Risk / Return Rank: 63
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 56
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTH vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URTH	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.92	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.71	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.34	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.46	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.11	10.68	+2.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URTH vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the NZAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTH and NZAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URTH	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.92	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.59	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.71	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.61	+0.11

Drawdowns

URTH vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, roughly equal to the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	URTH	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-33.72%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.06%	-10.10%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.94%	-16.19%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.05%	-28.31%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.01%	-33.72%	-0.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.82%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-5.32%	+0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.32%	-0.33%

Volatility

URTH vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is 3.27%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that URTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URTH	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	3.72%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.42%	10.34%	-0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	12.94%	-0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	16.81%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.27%	17.14%	+0.13%

URTH vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTH has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

URTH vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than NZAC's 2.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.04%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF	1.35%	1.48%	1.47%	1.70%	1.68%	1.50%	1.52%	2.16%	2.30%	1.88%	2.15%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URTH and NZAC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, URTH and NZAC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, URTH or NZAC?

NZAC has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to URTH (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTH dropped -34.01% vs NZAC's -33.72%.

Which ETF is better, URTH or NZAC?

On 10-year performance, URTH leads with 13.19% vs 12.16% for NZAC. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, URTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URTH or NZAC?

Over the 10-year period, URTH has performed better with a 13.19% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URTH or NZAC?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for URTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URTH or NZAC?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.35% for URTH.

What is the main difference between URTH and NZAC?

URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net), while NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for URTH and 0.12% for NZAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.