PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTH vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

URTH vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

URTH vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
-2.13%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%11.13%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.43%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.43% return.


URTH

1D
0.99%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
-2.13%
6M
0.51%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
12.17%

CCOR

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
0.52%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
-3.35%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URTH vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTH has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

URTH vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTH vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URTHCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

-0.12

+1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

-0.10

+1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.99

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

-0.17

+1.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.34

-0.32

+8.66

URTH vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTH and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URTHCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

-0.12

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

-0.09

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.15

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between URTH and CCOR is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

URTH vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.52%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

URTH vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


URTHCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-22.99%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-9.17%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.05%

-22.99%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-17.30%

+11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-7.08%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

4.97%

-2.50%

Volatility

URTH vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.13%. This indicates that URTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


URTHCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

2.13%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

5.44%

+4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

10.73%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

11.13%

+5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

10.81%

+6.46%