URNU.L vs. FLCH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URNU.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URNU.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNU.L returned 39.46%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for FLCH. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNU.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNU.L achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -8.95% return.

URNU.L

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -12.88%
• YTD: 17.09%
• 6M: 7.65%
• 1Y: 58.87%
• 3Y*: 39.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -7.63%
• YTD: -8.95%
• 6M: -11.33%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: -5.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc	17.09%	70.47%	1.22%	39.91%	3.03%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-8.95%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between URNU.L and FLCH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022	0.30

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URNU.L	FLCH
Energy	60.4%	3.7%
Industrials	25.4%	9.1%
Utilities	9.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	4.3%	5.5%
Technology	0.9%	12.9%
Communication Services	-	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	23.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.3%
Financial Services	-	18.2%
Healthcare	-	5.3%
Real Estate	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

URNU.L vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNU.L

URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URNU.L	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	0.14	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	0.34	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.04	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	0.17	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	0.37	+4.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNU.L and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URNU.L	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	0.14	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.01	+0.88

Drawdowns

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNU.L and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNU.L	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.62%	-62.09%	+23.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.08%	-16.64%	-16.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.62%	-25.43%	-13.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.85%	-35.82%	+18.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.93%	-30.53%	+19.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.72%	7.51%	+6.21%

Volatility

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.46%. This indicates that URNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URNU.L	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.95%	6.46%	+8.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.44%	13.87%	+21.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.25%	19.27%	+30.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.61%	29.60%	+11.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.61%	27.91%	+12.70%

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNU.L vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

URNU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.59%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
URNU.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNU.L and FLCH in my portfolio?

URNU.L and FLCH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, URNU.L or FLCH?

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNU.L or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNU.L.

What is the main difference between URNU.L and FLCH?

URNU.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for URNU.L and 0.19% for FLCH.