PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. SGDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNM vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with URNM having a -11.51% return and SGDM slightly higher at -11.23%.


URNM

1D
-1.78%
1M
-8.06%
6M
-34.68%
YTD
-11.51%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.97%

SGDM

1D
-2.85%
1M
-5.85%
6M
-18.69%
YTD
-11.23%
1Y
38.43%
3Y*
35.17%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
8.54%
ALL TIME*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.70M$1.88M$3.01M
$16.15M$21.14M$35.55M

URNM vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
-11.51%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%4.05%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
-11.23%153.46%12.14%2.34%-8.23%-9.15%21.85%6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and SGDM is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.40

The correlation between URNM and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

URNM vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URNM
SGDM

Energy

97.6%

-

Basic Materials

2.4%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

URNM
97.6%
SGDM

-

Basic Materials

URNM
2.4%
SGDM
100.0%

Communication Services

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Consumer Defensive

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Financial Services

URNM

-

SGDM
0.2%

Healthcare

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Industrials

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Real Estate

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Technology

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Utilities

URNM

-

SGDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDM
SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URNM vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URNMSGDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.08

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

2.32

-1.79

URNM vs. SGDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the SGDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and SGDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URNM vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum SGDM drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and SGDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMSGDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-54.95%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-38.29%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.78%

-38.29%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

-45.06%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.17%

-35.16%

-7.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-25.55%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.85%

17.71%

+3.14%

Volatility

URNM vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) at 12.24%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNMSGDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.67%

12.24%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.86%

39.30%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.26%

47.67%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.65%

36.54%

+12.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.95%

36.98%

+9.97%

URNM vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

URNM vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than SGDM's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
1.18%1.04%1.04%1.39%1.42%1.33%0.30%0.25%0.50%0.58%0.02%1.47%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.59%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URNM and SGDM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to SGDM (12.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs SGDM's -54.95%.

On 5-year performance, SGDM leads with 17.63% vs 13.97% for URNM. On fees, SGDM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDM has been the lower-risk option at 12.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGDM has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGDM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.18% for SGDM.

URNM is categorized as Uranium, while SGDM is Gold. URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.50% for SGDM.

SGDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNM and SGDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer