URNM vs. BCIM
Compare and contrast key facts about NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM).
URNM and BCIM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. BCIM is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Industrial Metals. It was launched on Sep 22, 2021. Both URNM and BCIM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
URNM vs. BCIM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URNM vs. BCIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 15.05% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | -5.97% |
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 0.00% | 10.71% | 3.30% | -9.68% | -3.29% | 4.17% |
Returns By Period
URNM
- 1D
- 8.06%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 101.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BCIM
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URNM vs. BCIM - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BCIM's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
URNM vs. BCIM — Risk / Return Rank
URNM
BCIM
URNM vs. BCIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNM | BCIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNM | BCIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between URNM and BCIM is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
URNM vs. BCIM - Dividend Comparison
URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than BCIM's 3.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
BCIM abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 3.77% | 3.77% | 11.47% | 3.36% | 0.72% | 1.57% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
URNM vs. BCIM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNM | BCIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.81% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | — | — |
Volatility
URNM vs. BCIM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URNM | BCIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.55% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.02% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.76% | — | — |