PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCIM vs. SEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BCIM vs. SEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BCIM vs. SEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BCIM
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF
0.00%10.71%3.30%-9.68%-10.04%
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
19.09%16.78%2.52%19.33%-17.28%

Returns By Period


BCIM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEA

1D
2.77%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
19.09%
6M
27.29%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BCIM vs. SEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCIM has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than SEA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BCIM vs. SEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCIM

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCIM vs. SEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCIM) and U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCIM vs. SEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCIMSEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Correlation

The correlation between BCIM and SEA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BCIM vs. SEA - Dividend Comparison

BCIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than SEA's 5.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
BCIM
abrdn Bloomberg Industrial Metals Strategy K-1 Free ETF
3.77%3.77%11.47%3.36%0.72%1.57%
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.67%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%0.00%

Drawdowns

BCIM vs. SEA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BCIMSEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

Volatility

BCIM vs. SEA - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BCIMSEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%