URNJ vs. HAP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URNJ (Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - URNJ tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNJ returned 23.94%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for HAP. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNJ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.

Performance

URNJ vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNJ achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than HAP's 21.52% return.

URNJ

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -7.79%
• YTD: 9.96%
• 6M: 3.54%
• 1Y: 58.13%
• 3Y*: 23.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAP

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 21.52%
• 6M: 23.43%
• 1Y: 47.01%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNJ vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF	9.96%	45.35%	-18.34%	19.92%
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	21.52%	34.91%	-4.08%	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between URNJ and HAP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023	0.45

URNJ vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URNJ	HAP
Energy	95.1%	32.3%
Basic Materials	4.9%	36.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.5%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.8%
Industrials	-	10.2%
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Technology	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	9.8%

Return for Risk

URNJ vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNJ

URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 29
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 25

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 90
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNJ vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URNJ	HAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	3.17	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	4.04	-2.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.57	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	5.69	-4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.32	23.18	-19.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URNJ vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNJ and HAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URNJ	HAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	3.17	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.26	+0.01

Drawdowns

URNJ vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNJ drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNJ and HAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNJ	HAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.21%	-50.73%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.54%	-8.31%	-27.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.21%	-16.92%	-42.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.46%	-1.93%	-29.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.18%	-12.03%	-9.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.58%	2.03%	+15.55%

Volatility

URNJ vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) has a higher volatility of 17.47% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.27%. This indicates that URNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URNJ	HAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.47%	4.27%	+13.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.56%	12.23%	+33.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.05%	14.91%	+46.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.32%	18.24%	+35.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.32%	19.73%	+33.59%

URNJ vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNJ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNJ vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

URNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than HAP's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.87%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF	5.99%	6.58%	4.33%	4.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNJ and HAP in my portfolio?

URNJ and HAP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URNJ or HAP?

URNJ has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to HAP (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNJ dropped -59.21% vs HAP's -50.73%.

Which ETF is better, URNJ or HAP?

On 3-year performance, URNJ leads with 23.94% vs 19.18% for HAP. On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URNJ or HAP?

Over the 3-year period, URNJ has performed better with a 23.94% return vs 19.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNJ or HAP?

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for URNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URNJ or HAP?

URNJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 1.87% for HAP.

What is the main difference between URNJ and HAP?

URNJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for URNJ and 0.42% for HAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.