URNJ vs. URNM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

URNJ (Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF) and URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) are both Uranium funds from Sprott - URNJ tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross while URNM tracks the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNJ returned 20.81%/yr vs 23.55%/yr for URNM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. URNJ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for URNM.

Performance

URNJ vs. URNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNJ achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than URNM's 2.35% return.

URNJ

• 1D: -4.34%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: -0.24%
• 6M: -3.16%
• 1Y: 35.18%
• 3Y*: 20.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URNM

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -3.50%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNJ vs. URNM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF	-0.24%	45.35%	-18.34%	18.66%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	2.35%	40.78%	-14.13%	32.61%

Correlation

The correlation between URNJ and URNM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.96

The correlation between URNJ and URNM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

URNJ vs. URNM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URNJ	URNM
Energy	95.3%	97.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	2.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

URNJ vs. URNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNJ

URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 19
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

URNM

URNM Risk / Return Rank: 18
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNJ vs. URNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URNJ	URNM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	0.54	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.10	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	0.73	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.83	1.71	+0.12

URNJ vs. URNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the URNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNJ and URNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URNJ vs. URNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNJ drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than URNM's maximum drawdown of -50.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNJ and URNM.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNJ	URNM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.21%	-50.78%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.66%	-38.72%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.21%	-50.78%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.82%	-33.11%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.53%	-18.13%	-3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.31%	16.41%	+2.90%

Volatility

URNJ vs. URNM - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) has a higher volatility of 19.76% compared to Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) at 17.99%. This indicates that URNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URNJ	URNM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.76%	17.99%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.08%	41.79%	+5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.91%	52.42%	+9.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.69%	48.56%	+5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.69%	47.04%	+6.65%

URNJ vs. URNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNJ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than URNM's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNJ vs. URNM - Dividend Comparison

URNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, more than URNM's 3.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF	6.60%	6.58%	4.33%	4.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	3.10%	3.18%	3.18%	3.63%	0.00%	6.70%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNJ and URNM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, URNJ and URNM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, URNJ or URNM?

URNJ has higher volatility (19.76%) compared to URNM (17.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNJ dropped -59.21% vs URNM's -50.78%.

Which ETF is better, URNJ or URNM?

On 3-year performance, URNM leads with 23.55% vs 20.81% for URNJ. On fees, URNJ is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, URNM has been the lower-risk option at 17.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URNJ or URNM?

Over the 3-year period, URNM has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 20.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNJ or URNM?

URNJ is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URNJ or URNM?

URNJ has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 3.10% for URNM.

What is the main difference between URNJ and URNM?

URNJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for URNJ and 0.85% for URNM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.