PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNJ vs. BILD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNJ vs. BILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNJ achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 8.06% return.


URNJ

1D
-1.95%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
9.96%
6M
3.54%
1Y
58.13%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
10Y*

BILD

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
8.06%
6M
9.06%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNJ vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
9.96%45.35%-18.34%4.26%
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
8.06%21.08%-2.68%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between URNJ and BILD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.18

URNJ vs. BILD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URNJ
BILD

Energy

95.1%
18.4%

Basic Materials

4.9%

-

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

5.5%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

54.2%

Energy

URNJ
95.1%
BILD
18.4%

Basic Materials

URNJ
4.9%
BILD

-

Communication Services

URNJ

-

BILD
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

URNJ

-

BILD

-

Consumer Defensive

URNJ

-

BILD

-

Financial Services

URNJ

-

BILD

-

Healthcare

URNJ

-

BILD

-

Industrials

URNJ

-

BILD
20.4%

Real Estate

URNJ

-

BILD
5.5%

Technology

URNJ

-

BILD

-

Utilities

URNJ

-

BILD
54.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNJ vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNJ
URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BILD
BILD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNJ vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNJBILDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.60

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

7.27

-3.95

URNJ vs. BILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the BILD Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNJ and BILD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URNJBILDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.46

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.90

-0.63

Drawdowns

URNJ vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNJ drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNJ and BILD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNJBILDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.21%

-14.78%

-44.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.54%

-6.05%

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.46%

-4.32%

-27.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-3.71%

-17.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.58%

2.16%

+15.42%

Volatility

URNJ vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) has a higher volatility of 17.47% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 4.12%. This indicates that URNJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNJBILDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.47%

4.12%

+13.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.56%

8.90%

+36.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.05%

10.80%

+50.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.32%

13.22%

+40.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.32%

13.22%

+40.10%

URNJ vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNJ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

URNJ vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison

URNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than BILD's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
2.84%3.05%5.53%0.52%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
5.99%6.58%4.33%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


URNJ and BILD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNJ has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to BILD (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNJ dropped -59.21% vs BILD's -14.78%.

On 1-year performance, URNJ leads with 58.13% vs 15.66% for BILD. On fees, BILD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, URNJ has performed better with a 58.13% return vs 15.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for URNJ.

URNJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 2.84% for BILD.

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for URNJ and 0.49% for BILD.

BILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNJ and BILD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer