URNG.L vs. BOTG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URNG.L (Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - URNG.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components, while BOTG.L is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNG.L returned 36.12%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for BOTG.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BOTG.L.

Performance

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNG.L achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's 9.21% return.

URNG.L

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -11.09%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 60.97%
• 3Y*: 36.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOTG.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: 9.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
URNG.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	18.27%	58.50%	2.96%	30.86%	-14.11%
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	9.21%	5.46%	14.97%	32.61%	-15.30%

Correlation

The correlation between URNG.L and BOTG.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2022	0.48

The correlation between URNG.L and BOTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNG.L

URNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
URNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
URNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
URNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
URNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
URNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URNG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.05	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	1.65	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.22	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.83	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	5.12	-0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNG.L and BOTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URNG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.05	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.04	+0.48

Drawdowns

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNG.L and BOTG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.98%	-43.70%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.59%	-15.67%	-16.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.98%	-30.90%	-8.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.93%	-7.43%	-6.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.79%	-19.30%	+6.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.75%	5.60%	+7.15%

Volatility

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) has a higher volatility of 14.89% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) at 12.02%. This indicates that URNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URNG.L	BOTG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.89%	12.02%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.87%	19.88%	+13.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.10%	27.30%	+21.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.66%	28.40%	+11.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.66%	28.40%	+11.26%

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNG.L vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

URNG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.22%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%
URNG.L Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNG.L and BOTG.L in my portfolio?

URNG.L and BOTG.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, URNG.L or BOTG.L?

On fees, BOTG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNG.L or BOTG.L?

BOTG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URNG.L.

What is the main difference between URNG.L and BOTG.L?

URNG.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while BOTG.L is Robotics. URNG.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components, while BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for URNG.L and 0.50% for BOTG.L.