PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
URNG.L vs. NUCG.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


URNG.LNUCG.L
YTD Return13.47%42.04%
1Y Return16.00%43.74%
Sharpe Ratio0.441.07
Sortino Ratio0.901.76
Omega Ratio1.101.27
Calmar Ratio0.442.03
Martin Ratio1.124.16
Ulcer Index13.63%10.70%
Daily Std Dev34.86%41.58%
Max Drawdown-34.46%-21.97%
Current Drawdown-8.19%-1.65%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between URNG.L and NUCG.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, URNG.L achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly lower than NUCG.L's 42.04% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.27%
17.72%
URNG.L
NUCG.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NUCG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


URNG.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
Expense ratio chart for URNG.L: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for NUCG.L: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for URNG.L, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for URNG.L, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for URNG.L, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for URNG.L, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for URNG.L, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.40
NUCG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NUCG.L, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NUCG.L, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.76
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NUCG.L, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NUCG.L, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NUCG.L, currently valued at 4.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.16

URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the NUCG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNG.L and NUCG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.50
1.07
URNG.L
NUCG.L

Dividends

URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither URNG.L nor NUCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.46%, which is greater than NUCG.L's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNG.L and NUCG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.19%
-1.65%
URNG.L
NUCG.L

Volatility

URNG.L vs. NUCG.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.77% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) at 12.05%. This indicates that URNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.77%
12.05%
URNG.L
NUCG.L