URE vs. SAA
URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) are both exchange-traded funds - URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while SAA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URE returned 2.00%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for SAA. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
URE vs. SAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 24.02% return, which is significantly lower than SAA's 40.69% return. Over the past 10 years, URE has underperformed SAA with an annualized return of 2.00%, while SAA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
URE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- YTD
- 24.02%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- -3.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.02%
SAA
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 23.30%
- YTD
- 40.69%
- 1Y
- 58.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.34%
URE vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 24.02% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 40.69% | 0.29% | 5.60% | 21.32% | -36.17% | 51.77% | -1.79% | 42.39% | -23.00% | 23.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and SAA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.63 |
The correlation between URE and SAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URE vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank
URE
SAA
URE vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URE | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.28 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.23 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.31 | 10.51 | -8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URE vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than SAA's maximum drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and SAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -87.39% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -18.21% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.77% | -50.84% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | -55.37% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | -74.54% | +4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.51% | -4.54% | -43.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -27.26% | -37.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 5.59% | +1.24% |
Volatility
URE vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) at 7.48%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URE | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 7.48% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.24% | 24.17% | -1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.49% | 35.47% | -6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.45% | 43.28% | -5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 46.01% | -5.34% |
URE vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both URE and SAA have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
URE vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than SAA's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.77% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 1.97% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URE and SAA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URE has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to SAA (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs SAA's -87.39%.
On 10-year performance, SAA leads with 11.73% vs 2.00% for URE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SAA has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SAA has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URE and SAA have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
URE has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.77% for SAA.
URE is categorized as REIT, while SAA is Leveraged Equities. URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while SAA tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index (200%).
SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URE and SAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer