URE vs. NETL
URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%) while NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, URE returned -3.22%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for NETL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
URE vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than NETL's 14.72% return.
URE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 6M
- 20.09%
- 1Y
- 15.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
NETL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
URE vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 20.85% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 18.08% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 14.72% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 12.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and NETL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between URE and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URE vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
URE
NETL
URE vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URE | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.19 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.70 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 5.35 | -3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URE vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -51.48% | -45.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -9.16% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.77% | -19.30% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | -30.74% | -32.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.82% | -1.13% | -48.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.46% | -11.56% | -52.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 2.91% | +3.88% |
Volatility
URE vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 5.27%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URE | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.64% | 5.27% | +5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.24% | 10.35% | +10.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 14.03% | +14.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.43% | 17.99% | +19.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.62% | 25.86% | +14.76% |
URE vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
URE vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than NETL's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.65% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.02% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URE and NETL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URE has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to NETL (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 2.22% vs -3.22% for URE. On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 2.22% return vs -3.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 2.02% for URE.
URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.60% for NETL.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URE and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer