URE vs. FAI
URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while FAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URE returned 13.16% vs 49.94% for FAI. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FAI.
Performance
URE vs. FAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly lower than FAI's 28.90% return.
URE
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 13.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- -4.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
FAI
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 25.51%
- YTD
- 28.90%
- 1Y
- 49.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URE vs. FAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 19.90% | -3.65% | -11.62% |
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 28.90% | 33.37% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and FAI is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | 0.04 |
The correlation between URE and FAI shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URE vs. FAI — Risk / Return Rank
URE
FAI
URE vs. FAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.64 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 7.77 | -5.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URE vs. FAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than FAI's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and FAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -27.82% | -69.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -18.84% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.21% | -8.44% | -41.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.43% | -5.48% | -58.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 6.38% | +0.45% |
Volatility
URE vs. FAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) is 10.30%, while First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that URE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URE | FAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.30% | 11.84% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.08% | 23.56% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.35% | 27.99% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.51% | 31.12% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.63% | 31.12% | +9.51% |
URE vs. FAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FAI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
URE vs. FAI - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.03% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URE and FAI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAI has higher volatility (11.84%) compared to URE (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs FAI's -27.82%.
On 1-year performance, FAI leads with 49.94% vs 13.16% for URE. On fees, FAI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, URE has been the lower-risk option at 10.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FAI has performed better with a 49.94% return vs 13.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
URE has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
URE is categorized as REIT, while FAI is Technology Equities. URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.65% for FAI.
FAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URE and FAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer