PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URE vs. BLDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

URE vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

URE vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
1.63%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%22.71%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
-0.71%4.26%8.18%1.76%-14.66%22.47%15.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.71% return.


URE

1D
3.10%
1M
-13.10%
YTD
1.63%
6M
-6.51%
1Y
-6.88%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-2.68%
10Y*
1.86%

BLDG

1D
0.23%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-4.12%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URE vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

URE vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDG
BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URE vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UREBLDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

0.47

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.07

0.73

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.10

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

0.58

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.62

2.11

-2.73

URE vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URE Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URE and BLDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UREBLDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

0.47

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.15

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.38

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between URE and BLDG is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

URE vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than BLDG's 6.11% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.30%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
6.11%7.46%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

URE vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and BLDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UREBLDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-27.25%

-69.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.93%

-10.80%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.66%

-27.25%

-36.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.80%

-8.75%

-49.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.63%

-9.44%

-55.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

2.98%

+4.60%

Volatility

URE vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.17%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UREBLDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

4.17%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.05%

7.34%

+11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.54%

13.30%

+19.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.26%

15.22%

+22.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.50%

15.60%

+24.90%