PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URB.TO vs. FFN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Urbana Corporation (URB.TO) and North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URB.TO achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than FFN.TO's 8.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with URB.TO having a 19.05% annualized return and FFN.TO not far behind at 18.18%.


URB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
8.58%
1Y
47.67%
3Y*
35.02%
5Y*
24.98%
10Y*
19.05%

FFN.TO

1D
1.86%
1M
8.81%
YTD
8.26%
6M
23.29%
1Y
75.67%
3Y*
60.52%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
18.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URB.TO
Urbana Corporation
-3.28%71.25%25.08%14.21%18.74%31.08%4.05%18.08%-27.20%23.60%
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
8.26%67.71%93.70%8.74%-38.50%119.88%-38.82%66.25%-42.19%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between URB.TO and FFN.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2004

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

URB.TO:

CA$383.32M

FFN.TO:

CA$615.42M

EPS

URB.TO:

CA$2.36

FFN.TO:

CA$7.22

PE Ratio

URB.TO:

3.93

FFN.TO:

1.37

PEG Ratio

URB.TO:

0.07

FFN.TO:

0.05

PS Ratio

URB.TO:

6.37

FFN.TO:

1.32

PB Ratio

URB.TO:

0.70

FFN.TO:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

URB.TO:

CA$60.16M

FFN.TO:

CA$465.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

URB.TO:

CA$52.98M

FFN.TO:

CA$375.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

URB.TO:

CA$110.36M

FFN.TO:

CA$196.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URB.TO
URB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
URB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
URB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
URB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
URB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FFN.TO
FFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Urbana Corporation (URB.TO) and North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URB.TOFFN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.66

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

3.61

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

14.20

-5.75

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URB.TO and FFN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URB.TOFFN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

3.43

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.60

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.00

+0.36

Drawdowns

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URB.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FFN.TO drawdown of -88.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URB.TO and FFN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URB.TOFFN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-88.78%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.15%

-21.05%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-43.09%

+28.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.77%

-64.95%

+50.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.07%

-66.99%

+11.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.64%

0.00%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.32%

-25.88%

-15.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.69%

5.35%

+0.34%

Volatility

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Urbana Corporation (URB.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) at 3.60%. This indicates that URB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URB.TOFFN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

3.60%

+6.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.72%

20.20%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.35%

22.19%

+5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.71%

35.63%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.49%

41.10%

-8.61%

Dividends

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

URB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FFN.TO's 13.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
13.77%14.01%17.88%5.12%13.39%18.23%6.63%17.84%24.94%13.79%7.69%14.23%
URB.TO
Urbana Corporation
1.51%1.34%2.07%2.32%2.35%2.44%2.76%2.44%4.00%2.83%1.69%2.44%

Financials

URB.TO vs. FFN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Urbana Corporation and North American Financial 15 Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
6.09M
15.83M
(URB.TO) Total Revenue
(FFN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


URB.TO and FFN.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URB.TO and FFN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer