FFN.TO vs. ENS
Compare and contrast key facts about North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) and EnerSys (ENS).
Performance
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFN.TO North American Financial 15 Split Corp. | -11.14% | 67.71% | 93.70% | 8.74% | -38.50% | 119.88% | -38.82% | 66.25% | -42.19% | 9.18% |
ENS EnerSys | 22.94% | 52.93% | 0.37% | 34.86% | 1.09% | -4.91% | 10.29% | -7.36% | 22.00% | -15.70% |
Different Trading Currencies
FFN.TO is traded in CAD, while ENS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ENS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
FFN.TO:
CA$517.32M
ENS:
$6.70B
FFN.TO:
CA$7.60
ENS:
$8.16
FFN.TO:
1.09
ENS:
21.78
FFN.TO:
0.04
ENS:
0.73
FFN.TO:
1.06
ENS:
1.82
FFN.TO:
0.87
ENS:
3.54
FFN.TO:
CA$465.06M
ENS:
$3.74B
FFN.TO:
CA$375.35M
ENS:
$1.11B
FFN.TO:
CA$196.23M
ENS:
$508.08M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFN.TO achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than ENS's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFN.TO has outperformed ENS with an annualized return of 16.71%, while ENS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.13% annualized return.
FFN.TO
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -11.14%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 64.98%
- 3Y*
- 43.37%
- 5Y*
- 18.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
ENS
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 22.94%
- 6M
- 54.70%
- 1Y
- 88.46%
- 3Y*
- 29.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFN.TO vs. ENS — Risk / Return Rank
FFN.TO
ENS
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) and EnerSys (ENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFN.TO | ENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 2.21 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.42 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.19 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.88 | 10.20 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFN.TO | ENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.21 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.54 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FFN.TO and ENS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Dividend Comparison
FFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.38%, more than ENS's 0.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFN.TO North American Financial 15 Split Corp. | 16.38% | 14.01% | 17.88% | 5.12% | 13.39% | 18.23% | 6.63% | 17.84% | 24.94% | 13.79% | 7.69% | 14.23% |
ENS EnerSys | 0.58% | 0.68% | 1.01% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 0.89% | 0.84% | 0.94% | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.90% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.08%, which is greater than ENS's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFN.TO and ENS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFN.TO | ENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.08% | -83.95% | -16.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.05% | -20.08% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.95% | -41.77% | -23.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.99% | -56.27% | -10.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.07% | -6.20% | -93.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.03% | -18.14% | -74.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 8.12% | -2.32% |
Volatility
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Volatility Comparison
North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to EnerSys (ENS) at 12.25%. This indicates that FFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFN.TO | ENS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.62% | 12.25% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 28.10% | -8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.88% | 40.28% | -11.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 32.34% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.55% | 34.75% | +6.80% |
Financials
FFN.TO vs. ENS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Financial 15 Split Corp. and EnerSys. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities