PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFN.TO vs. ENS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) and EnerSys (ENS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
-11.14%67.71%93.70%8.74%-38.50%119.88%-38.82%66.25%-42.19%9.18%
ENS
EnerSys
22.94%52.93%0.37%34.86%1.09%-4.91%10.29%-7.36%22.00%-15.70%
Different Trading Currencies

FFN.TO is traded in CAD, while ENS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ENS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FFN.TO:

CA$517.32M

ENS:

$6.70B

EPS

FFN.TO:

CA$7.60

ENS:

$8.16

PE Ratio

FFN.TO:

1.09

ENS:

21.78

PEG Ratio

FFN.TO:

0.04

ENS:

0.73

PS Ratio

FFN.TO:

1.06

ENS:

1.82

PB Ratio

FFN.TO:

0.87

ENS:

3.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

FFN.TO:

CA$465.06M

ENS:

$3.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FFN.TO:

CA$375.35M

ENS:

$1.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

FFN.TO:

CA$196.23M

ENS:

$508.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFN.TO achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than ENS's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFN.TO has outperformed ENS with an annualized return of 16.71%, while ENS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.13% annualized return.


FFN.TO

1D
1.47%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
-11.14%
6M
10.94%
1Y
64.98%
3Y*
43.37%
5Y*
18.63%
10Y*
16.71%

ENS

1D
2.24%
1M
9.09%
YTD
22.94%
6M
54.70%
1Y
88.46%
3Y*
29.31%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFN.TO vs. ENS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFN.TO
FFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ENS
ENS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) and EnerSys (ENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFN.TOENSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

2.21

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.42

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.19

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

10.20

+0.68

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the ENS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFN.TO and ENS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFN.TOENSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.21

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.41

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Correlation

The correlation between FFN.TO and ENS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Dividend Comparison

FFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.38%, more than ENS's 0.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
16.38%14.01%17.88%5.12%13.39%18.23%6.63%17.84%24.94%13.79%7.69%14.23%
ENS
EnerSys
0.58%0.68%1.01%0.79%0.95%0.89%0.84%0.94%0.90%1.01%0.90%1.25%

Drawdowns

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.08%, which is greater than ENS's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFN.TO and ENS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFN.TOENSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.08%

-83.95%

-16.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.05%

-20.08%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.95%

-41.77%

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.99%

-56.27%

-10.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.07%

-6.20%

-93.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.03%

-18.14%

-74.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

8.12%

-2.32%

Volatility

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Volatility Comparison

North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.62% compared to EnerSys (ENS) at 12.25%. This indicates that FFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFN.TOENSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.62%

12.25%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

28.10%

-8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.88%

40.28%

-11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

32.34%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.55%

34.75%

+6.80%

Financials

FFN.TO vs. ENS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Financial 15 Split Corp. and EnerSys. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20212022202320242025
15.83M
919.13M
(FFN.TO) Total Revenue
(ENS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FFN.TO values in CAD, ENS values in USD